Legal Opinion

Penrose v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1905No. 14,219PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; David M. Dale, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

S. W. Cooper brought an action against W. B. Penrose for the possession of two town lots, and recovered judgment, from which the defendant prosecutes error. The claim of Penrose was based upon two tax deeds, one of which had been of record for more than five years. Cooper claimed to hold title by a chain of conveyances running back to the patentee from the federal government. The important questions presented are whether the tax deeds were good upon their face, and, if not, whether the plaintiff showed that he had any standing to question…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gibson v. KuefferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Curry v. HinmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Christy v. RicholsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Dye v. Midland Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Gibson v. TrislerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Penrose v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. John v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. Kessler v. PolkoskySupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API