Feess v. Mechanics' State Bank

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

An application is made in behalf of the defendant bank by shareholders claiming to own a majority of its stock, and as intervenors, for the correction of a mandate. The facts upon which the judgment was rendered are stated in Feess v. Bank, 84 Kan. 828, 115. Pac. 563. The judgment was reversed and the cause was remanded for further proceedings.. The opinion held that the appointment of the receiver had been erroneously made, and that he had been erroneously continued in office, no sufficient grounds appearing for a receivership.

The…