Legal Opinion

McKee v. Cunningham

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1906No. Civ. No. 139PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The suit was brought by the plaintiff as assignee of the Los Angeles Furniture Company upon the al leged contract set out in the complaint, of date November 20, 1903; which is that on the day named, at the city of Los Angeles, “the said Los Angeles Furniture Company sold and delivered to the said defendants, and the said defendants had and received from the said Los Angeles Furniture Company, certain goods, wares and merchandise, for which the said defendants then and there agreed to pay the sum of $752.20”; which they have ever since refused to pay, etc. The answer denies the allegations of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bergtholdt v. Porter Bros.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ferguson v. McBeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Thomas v. MoodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Dobbs v. PuringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Simpson v. BergmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Bell v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API