Thomas v. Moody
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, in the Nineteenth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Wheeler, J. After the decision, the respondent filed his petition that the appeal be reheard in Bank, and the application was denied.
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, J.:
In the year 1869, the firm of Strowbridge & Son was formed, and engaged in the business of buying and selling wool—their place of business being in the city of Sacramento. From 1869 to about the month of February, 1871, the firm of Farish & Co. was engaged in the business of selling wool on commission at the city of San Francisco, and received wool from Strowbridge & Son, to be sold on commission. Farish & Co. also made advances to Strowbridge & Son on their wool—the advances being made by means of drafts drawn by the latter on Farish & Co. These drafts were drawn and paid as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
3Cited by12 opinions
- Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bogart v. Crosby & Van HarenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Larson v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- McKee v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.