Dobbs v. Purington
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
Action brought to recover the sum of $1,170.36, alleged to be due to the plaintiff for goods sold to the defendants, Purington and Trumbo, by Knight & Co., assignors of the plaintiff. The complaint was unverified, and the defendants separately answered by way of a general denial. The court found that the plaintiff’s assignors sold and delivered to defendant Trumbo merchandise of the reasonable value of $1,710.78; that he had agreed and promised to pay the same, but that only $540.42 had been paid, and that there was $1,170.36 still due and unpaid from said defendant to plaintiff, and rendered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Horton v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Shain v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Lewis v. ClarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Hughes v. AlsipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frazzini v. CableCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Nichols v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Allen v. Globe Grain and Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- McKee v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Iwanaga v. HagopianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.