State ex rel. Rodriguez v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Claimant challenged the first order denying permanent total disability compensation by an action in mandamus. Dissatisfied with the remedial action that the appellate court ordered, claimant appealed to this court. The commission, meanwhile, prepared a second order incorporating the appellate *213court’s instructions. Claimant contests the commission’s authority to issue the later order. We agree with claimant’s assertions, but decline to order the relief claimant seeks.
R.C. 4123.52 provides in part:
“The jurisdiction of the industrial commission over each case shall be continuing, and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- State Ex Rel. B & C MacHine Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Gatlin v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Borsuk v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Prayner v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State ex rel. Neitzelt v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Ewart v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Gibson v. Meadow Gold DairyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Koonce v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Kinnear Division v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.