Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Koonce v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1994No. 93-1665PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellate court, in making its determination, did not have the benefit of this court’s decision in State ex rel. Rodriguez v. Indus. Comm. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 210, 616 N.E.2d 929, which held that the commission’s continuing jurisdiction does not extend beyond the institution of mandamus proceedings. As such, the commission abused its discretion in vacating the order.

Turning to the merits, we find two related aspects of the order particularly troubling. First is the amount of significance the commission attaches to the percentage of impairment assigned by Dr. Hutchison. Second is the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Rodriguez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Domjancic v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Domjancic v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Clark v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API