Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kinnear Division v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1997No. 94-2390PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

In any order granting or denying benefits, the commission must specifically state which evidence and only that evidence it relied upon to reach its conclusion, and briefly explain the reasoning or basis for its decision. This court will not search beyond the face of the commission’s order for some evidence to support its decision. State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245; State ex rel. Basham v. Consolidation Coal Co. (1989), 43 Ohio St.3d 151, 152, 541 N.E.2d 47, 48; State ex rel. Frigidaire Div., Gen. Motors Corp. v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 35 Ohio St.3d…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Joyce v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Gitlin v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Cline v. Abke Trucking, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Kinnear Div., Harsco Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Vacha v. City of North RidgevilleOhio Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API