Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Meadow Gold Dairy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2000No. 1999-0429PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 201.] GIBSON, APPELLEE, v. MEADOW GOLD DAIRY, APPELLANT; ADMINISTRATOR OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Gibson v. Meadow Gold Dairy,

2000-Ohio-301.] Workers’ compensation—R.C. 4123.65 requirement that settlements of workers’ compensation claims against self-insured employers be in writing and not be effective for thirty days after signing applies to claims on appeal to a common pleas court under R.C. 4123.512 as well as to claims still at the administrative level. The requirement of R.C. 4123.65 that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Spercel v. Sterling Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. City of Middletown v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Mack v. Polson Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. OliverOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Clark v. ScarpelliOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. ChapmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State v. GatewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. Hawkins, 06ca79 (7-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API