State ex rel. Gatlin v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.
The thrust of our decision in Mitchell, supra, involved this court’s concern that “[claimants and employers alike, who appear before the commission, are frequently informed that requested benefits are either being granted or denied based on ‘the evidence in the file and/or the evidence adduced at the hearing.’ ” Id. at 483. Accordingly, the commission was ordered to henceforth specifically state which evidence was relied upon, accompanied by a brief explanation stating why a claimant is or is not entitled to “benefits.” Id. at 483-484.
*248A careful review and examination of Mitchell reveals that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State ex rel. Taylor v. GlasserOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Weimer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Board of Education v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. Ohio Stove Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. B & C MacHine Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Manns v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Case v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Lewis v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.