Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gatlin v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1985No. 84-961PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

The thrust of our decision in Mitchell, supra, involved this court’s concern that “[claimants and employers alike, who appear before the commission, are frequently informed that requested benefits are either being granted or denied based on ‘the evidence in the file and/or the evidence adduced at the hearing.’ ” Id. at 483. Accordingly, the commission was ordered to henceforth specifically state which evidence was relied upon, accompanied by a brief explanation stating why a claimant is or is not entitled to “benefits.” Id. at 483-484.

*248A careful review and examination of Mitchell reveals that…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Taylor v. GlasserOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Weimer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Board of Education v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State v. Ohio Stove Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. B & C MacHine Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Manns v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Case v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Lewis v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API