Legal Opinion
Patten & Davies Lumber Co. v. McConville
California Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 12476PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The following statement of facts is taken from the opinion rendered in this action by the District Court of Appeal:
“This is an action brought against the contractors and the surety on a bond furnished by them, to recover for materials used in the erection of an apartment house. The complaint alleged that materials of the value of $31,282.61 were furnished between May 1, 1927, and September 27, 1927, in pursuance of a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant contractors; that the defendant contractors agreed to pay for the same; that only the sum of $3,138.37 has been paid; and that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- County of Glenn v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Hub Hardware Co. v. Aetna Accident & Liab. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Hubbard v. JurianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Hartzell v. MyallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. SipperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Powers Regulator Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Green v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.