Hartzell v. Myall
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, J. pro tem.
This appeal is from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury awarding respondents both punitive and compensatory damages. The action involves an allegedly fraudulent sale of a furnished boarding house located at 608 27th Street in the city of Oakland. The appeal is also from the order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial, but since such an order is nonappealable, the purported appeal therefrom should be dismissed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 963; 2 Cal.Jur. § 34, p. 173; Roberts v. Brae, 5 Cal.2d 356 [54 P.2d 698].)
Respondents are husband and wife. Mrs. Hartzell was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Eramdjian v. Interstate Bakery Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- City of Menlo Park v. ArtinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.