Hubbard v. Jurian
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. A. Beasly, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
These are consolidated actions for the foreclosure of several liens, claimed for labor and materials furnished in the erection and construction of a building upon the premises of the defendants Odell and Jurian.
The facts are as follows: On the twenty-third day of September, 1912, the defendants Odell and Jurian entered into a written contract with one H. A. Spreen for the erection by the latter of a one-story concrete building upon the premises of said defendants for the contract price of $5,260, payable in four installments, as follows: First payment of $1,315 when the first floor joists…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Mills v. La Verne Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Sunset Lumber Co. v. BachelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Miller v. Mountain View Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Simpson v. BergmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Patten & Davies Lumber Co. v. McConvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- General Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Greenblatt v. GoldinSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.