Legal Opinion
People v. Sipper
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 8, 1943No. Nov. 8, 1943PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, Acting P. J.
Defendant was charged with a violation of section 6125 of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California, which provides, that “No person shall practice law in this State unless he is an active member of the State Bar. ’ ’ A verdict of guilty was returned by the jury. From the ensuing judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.
Viewing the evidence, as we must on an appeal, most favorably to respondent, and disregarding conflicting testimony (Patten & Davies Lbr. Co. v. McConville (1933), 219 Cal. 161, 164 [25 P.2d 429]; People v. Alexander (1940),…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ah Sin v. WittmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Williams v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- People v. . AlfaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Baron v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. SchaferIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. WintersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.