Legal Opinion
Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 27, 1945No. Civ. 14828PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
Action for damages for the alleged failure of respondent to fulfill a contract whereby it sold and agreed to deliver to appellant a quantity of cotton of a character, grade, and quality and at a price named in the contract, the details of which it is not necessary to amplify.
Appellant alleged that respondent failed to deliver the entire amount of the cotton contracted for, and that the portion that was delivered was of a quality or grade inferior to that provided for by the contract. For the alleged breach appellant sought damages. Findings of fact were in favor of respondent on all material…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Stanley v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Oldis v. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance MutuelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Stone v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.