Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Franklin-McKinley School District v. City of San Jose

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1991No. A047685PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.—

Introduction

Defendant City of San Jose (City) on April 7, 1988, adopted Ordinances Nos. 22758 through 22761 approving redevelopment plans for three new redevelopment project areas (Alum Rock Avenue Project Area, East Santa Clara Street Project Area, and Almaden-Gateway Project Area) and merging two of the three new areas (Alum Rock Avenue Project Area and East Santa Clara Street Project Area) with nine preexisting redevelopment project areas in San Jose. On June 1, 1988, plaintiff Franklin-McKinley School District (District) filed an action to determine the validity of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Walter Camp v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Twain Harte Homeowners Ass'n v. County of TuolumneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Karlson v. City of CamarilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Regus v. City of Baldwin ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Katz v. Campbell Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Community Youth Athletic Center v. City of National CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API