Karlson v. City of Camarillo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMANN, J. *
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandate sought by the appellant to set aside two amendments to the general plan of the respondent (hereinafter referred to as City) enacted pursuant to Government Code section 65000 et seq. The petition alleged that amendments 77-2 and 77-3 were inconsistent with various provisions of the general plan, citing Government Code section 65300.5 as requiring the integrated, internal consistency of a general plan. Although two parcels were involved in amendment 77-3, the petition objected only to the one denominated…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Arnel Development Co. v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. 32nd District Agricultural Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.