Legal Opinion
Community Youth Athletic Center v. City of National City
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 2013No. D060001, D061141PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
In 2007, defendants and appellants, the City of National City and its community development commission (the Commission or CDC; together, the City), approved an amendment to its 1995 redevelopment plan, ordinance No. 2007-2295 (Amendment), that extended the time period authorized by the plan for the use of eminent domain powers within a 300-acre area, based on certain designations of physical and economic blight. (Health & Saf. Code, § 33000 et seq.; the Community Redevelopment Law (CRL); all further statutory references are to the Health and Safety Code unless noted.) During…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of San Jose v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Robinson v. U-Haul Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Pacific Merchant Shipping Assn. v. Bd.of Pilot Commissioners CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Fredericks v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Sukumar v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.