Legal Opinion
Regus v. City of Baldwin Park
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 1977No. Civ. 49520PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLEMING, J.
Defendant City of Baldwin Park (City) on 3 and 8 July 1975, adopted ordinances No. 709 and No. 708 approving a redevelopment plan for the Puente-Merced/South Baldwin Park Redevelopment Project (Project) submitted to it by the Baldwin Park Redevelopment Agency (Redevelopment Agency). On 29 August 1975 plaintiffs filed their complaint challenging the project, pleading both a validation action (Code Civ. Proc., § 863 and Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33500, 33501) and a taxpayer’s action to enjoin illegal municipal expenditures (Code Civ. Proc., § 526a). Individual plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. v. Borough of PaulsboroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- McLeod v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT v. EmerichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Torres v. City of Yorba LindaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.