Legal Opinion
Twain Harte Homeowners Ass'n v. County of Tuolumne
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1982No. Civ. 6664PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORONY, J. *
Statement of the Case
This appeal arises out of challenges to the sufficiency of the Tuolumne County General Plan and to the adequacy of the environmental impact report prepared in connection with adoption of the general plan. “The Planning and Zoning Law (Gov. Code, tit. 7, div. 1, commencing with § 65000) requires[s] . . . that the board of supervisors of each county adopt a general plan for the ‘physical development’ of the county, pursuant to section 65300; that the plan be prepared and adopted according to standards established in section 65300.5 and 65301; and that it…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of HanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.