Legal Opinion
Katz v. Campbell Union High School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 2006No. H028994PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
Plaintiff Aaron L. Katz filed this action to invalidate an $85 parcel tax approved by voters in Campbell Union High School District (School District). The trial court dismissed the action because plaintiff had failed to publish a summons that conformed to the requirements of the validation statutes. (Code Civ. Proc., § 860 et seq.) Plaintiff appeals from the resulting judgment.
We conclude that the trial court correctly dismissed the action because plaintiff’s published summons did not specify a concrete date for response, the date calculable from the language of the summons…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- City of Ontario v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Sprague v. Equifax, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Planning and Conservation League v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Lee v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Calvert v. Al Binali, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Robinson v. U-Haul Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Community Youth Athletic Center v. City of National CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.