Matter of Contempt of Wright
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*419HUNTLEY, Justice.
By this appeal we are asked to determine whether there exists under the United States or the Idaho Constitution a newsperson’s qualified privilege to refuse to disclose confidential sources. We hold there is such a qualified privilege under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Art. I, § 9 of the Idaho Constitution. We reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
This case arose when Jim Wright, reporter for the Moscow, Idaho, Daily Idahonian, refused to disclose the name of a confidential source he had…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard KuhnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Zerilli v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Judy Garland v. Marie TorreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- State v. HammersleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. SalsburyIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Hudok v. HenryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- The New York Times Co. v. GonzalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.