Branzburg v. Hayes
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Mr. Justice White,
announced by The Chief Justice.
The issue in these cases is whether requiring newsmen to appear and testify before state or federal grand juries abridges the freedom of speech and press guaranteed by the First Amendment. We hold that it does not.
I
The writ of certiorari in No. 70-85, Branzburg v. Hayes and Meigs, brings before us two judgments of the Kentucky Court of Appeals, both involving petitioner Branzburg, a staff reporter for the Courier-Journal, a daily newspaper published in Louisville, Kentucky.
On November 15, 1969, the Courier-Journal carried…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,155 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
2,150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.