Legal Opinion
State v. Hammersley
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 2000No. 24902PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Justice.
NATURE OF THE CASE
This appeal arises from the magistrate court’s decision denying appellant Dana L. Hammersley’s (Hammersley) motion to dismiss challenging the constitutionality of section 18-6409 of the Idaho Code.
*818I.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Factual and Procedural Background
On February 7, 1997, Hammersley drove to Lakeland Junior High to pick up her daughter, Cassandra, age 13. When Hammersley arrived, Cassandra was talking with her friend Nicole “Nikki” Goodwin (Goodwin). After Cassandra got into her mother’s car, Hammersley yelled at Goodwin to “shut your fucking…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. SchulzIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. PoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Landrum v. SarrattCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. CardIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SuiterIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.