Legal Opinion
State v. Salsbury
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 1996No. 21645PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Justice.
KMVT Broadcasting moved to quash a subpoena duces tecum issued to obtain videotape taken by a KMVT reporter at the scene of a fatal automobile accident. The prosecution sought the videotape for use in criminal prosecution of a newspaper reporter who was charged with resisting and obstructing a police officer. KMVT asserted a privilege under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 9 of the Idaho Constitution. The district court affirmed the magistrate denying the motion to quash. KMVT appeals the decision.
I
BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
O…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Midwestern Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re Myron FarberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Hollenbach v. HaycraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. HammersleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- State v. SuiterIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- The New York Times Co. v. GonzalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re Inquest Subpoena (Wcax)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.