Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hudok v. Henry

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1989No. 19207PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice:

In this original proceeding in prohibition, we are asked to determine the extent of a news reporter’s privilege to decline to answer questions or to divulge information obtained in the course of his news-gathering function. The privilege is asserted under the free press clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, 1 as well as under Article III, Section 7 of the West Virginia Constitution. 2 The reporters, Ron Hudok and Natasha Singh, contend that the Honorable Patrick G. Henry, III, Judge of the Thirty-First Judicial Circuit, acted beyond his legitimate…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Watkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Suriano v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. Charleston Mail Ass'n v. RansonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. The New York Times Co. v. GonzalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. State ex rel. Lincoln Journal, Inc. v. HusteadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API