Legal Opinion
The New York Times Co. v. Gonzales
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 2, 2005No. 04 Civ. 7677(RWS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The defendants Alberto Gonzales (“Gonzales”) in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States 1 and the United States of America (collectively, the “government”) have moved under Rule 12, Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint of The New York Times Company (“The Times”) seeking a declaratory judgment concerning the confidentiality of telephone records for two of its reporters, which records are held by a third-party telephone company. The Times has moved for summary judgment under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., seeking certain of the relief sought in its…
2Cases cited168 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- The New York Times Company v. Alberto Gonzales, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States, and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- In Re Subpoena Issued to Commodity Futures Trading CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- In re Natural Gas Commodity LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Langbord v. United States Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.