Bearden v. U.S. Borax, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
Six mine workers appeal from an order dismissing their complaint based on their employer’s failure to allow a second meal break for the 12-hour shifts they were working. A statute requires that two meal breaks be allowed for shifts of that length. But an order of the Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) exempts employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The principal issue before us concerns the validity of that order. We find that the exemption contravenes the statute and is invalid.
We also reject the employer’s argument that the collective bargaining…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- ZB, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Thurman v. Bayshore Transit Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Guerrero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.