Thurman v. Bayshore Transit Management, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AARON, J.
In January 2004, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1309, AFL-CIO (the union), filed a representative action on behalf of its member bus drivers who worked in and around National City, California, alleging that the various defendant employers had violated provisions of the Labor Code1 that require employers to provide meal and rest periods for their employees. In February 2005, the union filed an operative verified third amended *1119complaint, which added a number of individual employees as plaintiffs, including appellant Leander H. Thurman. The named defendants included appellants…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- ZB, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Ramirez v. Ghilotti Bros.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Noe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Dailey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.