Legal Opinion
Guerrero v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 2013No. A133202PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Adelina Tapia Guerrero was employed to provide in-home support services (IHSS) to eligible recipients in Sonoma County (County) under the In-Home Support Services Act. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 12300 et seq.)1 She was never paid for any of the services she rendered to program recipient Alejandra Buenrostro from November 4, 2008, through January 29, 2009, despite a comprehensive scheme of federal and California statutes, implemented within County through enactment of local ordinances that spell out the responsibilities of County and the Sonoma County…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Jacqueline Benjamin v. B & H EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Morales v. 22nd District Agricultural Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Guadalupe Salazar v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Turman v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.