Legal Opinion

Morris v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1967No. Sac. No. 7817PublishedCited by 233 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

— We are called upon to inquire into the validity of certain amended regulations of the Health and Welfare Agency reducing benefits provided under the California Medical Assistance Program, popularly known as MediCal. Accordingly, as required by long established and unassailable California precedents, we here discharge our responsibility to determine whether the Agency has acted in obedience to the mandate of the Legislature or has ignored or violated it. [1] Our function is to inquire into the legality of the regulations, not their wisdom. Nor do we superimpose upon the agency any policy…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by233 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Nino v. Gladys R.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API