Legal Opinion
Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 2007No. 04-57134PublishedCited by 304 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
The named plaintiffs in this case (whom we will call “Burnside,” for the first named plaintiff) represent approximately 270 former and current employees of defendant Kiewit Pacific Corporation (“Kiewit”). Burnside alleges that Kiewit never compensated the employees for time they spent traveling from designated meeting sites to their jobsites and from those job-sites back to the designated meeting sites. Kiewit, Burnside further alleges, required them to undertake this round trip daily; they were not allowed to get to the job-sites on their own. This appeal requires us to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by304 opinions
- Kobold v. Good Samaritan Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Carl Curtis v. Irwin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Alaska Airlines v. Judy SchurkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Ian McCray v. Marriott Hotel ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Rutti v. Lojack Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
299 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.