Legal Opinion

McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2001No. S082236PublishedCited by 238 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

We granted review in this case, limited to the issue whether state law claims against a health maintenance organization (HMO), arising out of its refusal to provide services under a Medicare-subsidized health plan, fall within the exclusive review provisions of the Medicare Act requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies. (42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq.) *415As will appear, some disagreement exists among state and federal courts on this question, which has not yet been addressed by the United States Supreme Court. We conclude the claims made here do not fall within Medicare’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by238 opinions

  1. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Durell v. Sharp HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Farm Raised Salmon CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Berryman v. Merit Property Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007

233 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API