Legal Opinion
In Re Foster
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 1990No. 90-671PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
Finding violations by respondent of DR 6-101(A)(3) (neglect), DR 7-101(A)(l) (intentional failure to seek a client’s lawful objectives), and DR 7-102(A)(2) (intentional failure to carry out a contract of employment), 1 the Board of Professional Responsibility (the Board) has recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days. We accept 2 the Board’s findings, conclusions, and recommendation as set forth in its report which we reproduce in an appendix hereto.
Accordingly, we order that respondent, Irvin P. Foster, be suspended from the practice of law in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Matter of ThorupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Matter of DoryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of DoryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re StowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.