Legal Opinion

Matter of Dory

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 1989No. 88-740PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before the court on the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board). After considering a Report of a Hearing Committee, the Board found that Dory had neglected a legal matter in violation of DR 6-101(A)(3) and recommend suspension for thirty days.

The facts concerning Dory’s misconduct are summarized in the Board’s Report and Recommendation, a copy of which is attached. Briefly, Dory was retained by Mrs. Julia Johnson to probate her mother’s estate. Mrs. Johnson advanced Dory approximately $420 towards his legal fee and costs. After filing a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. In Re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. In the Matter of ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Matter of DoryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. In Re DrewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. In Re LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. In Re DunietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API