Legal Opinion

In Re Foster

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1997No. 96-BG-1898PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

For conduct it rightly terms “appalling,” the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that Respondent be disbarred from the practice of law and ordered to make restitution with interest. A copy of that Report and Recommendation is annexed hereto. Neither Respondent nor Bar Counsel has filed any exceptions; indeed, Respondent has failed to participate in any manner whatever in connection with these disciplinary proceedings at any point.

Accordingly, Respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective thirty days from the date hereof…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In the Matter of ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. In Re FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. In Re ManceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. In re SilvaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. In Re HuberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. In re Andre P. BarberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API