Hammons v. Superior Court of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
In this proceeding the petitioners claim that they are entitled to a writ of prohibition, restraining respondent court from rendering judgment by default against petitioners in an action brought against them in said court.
On the sixth day of July, 1923, an action to recover damages for an alleged libel was commenced in the superior court of Los Angeles County by Lyle W. Eucker against the above-named petitioners. The complaint was filed and summons issued on that day. Petitioner Hammons is a citizen and actual resident of the state of New York. He is vice-president of Educational Films…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Consolidated Adjustment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Burroughs v. Cocke & WillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Filer v. McCornickDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1919
- Page v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Chaplin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Murrey v. MurreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Cooke v. CookeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.