Page v. Randall
California Supreme Court
Certiorari to the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco. The defendants were summoned to appear and answer in the Court below touching their property, under proceedings supplementary to execution, on the application of Joseph Hetherington, the assignee of the judgment against them.
Read the full summary
Certiorari to the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco. The defendants were summoned to appear and answer in the Court below touching their property, under proceedings supplementary to execution, on the application of Joseph Hetherington, the assignee of the judgment against them. The defendant, Andrew Randall, put in a sworn answer averring that he resided in Marin County, and was only in San Francisco to attend to certain cases before the U. S. Land Commission; in which he was interested, and praying that the proceedings be dismissed. Opposing affidavits of Hetherington, and of one…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Murray.
Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
The appellant was summoned to appear and answer, touching his property, under the provision of the statute entitled “ proceedings supplementary to execution.” In his answer he alleges that he is not a resident of San Francisco, but of another county, and that he was in San Francisco for the most part in attendance as a suitor upon the Board of United States Land Commissioners; it does not allege that at the precise time of the summons he was in attendance upon any Court as witness, juror, or party,…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Christian v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Bechtel v. WierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Baldwin v. EmersonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1888
- Hammons v. Superior Court of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.