Legal Opinion

Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1895No. 15301PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

The Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Company is a corporation, organized under the laws of California, with its principal place of business at the city of San Francisco. It is the owner of one of the mining claims on the Comstock lode, in the state of Nevada, where for many years it has been' engaged in the business of mining gold and silver bearing ores.

The plaintiff, M. W. Fox, since the year 1887, has been at all times a stockholder of said corporation. In August and September, 1890, he addressed communications to its board of directors, and to the individual members of the board, charging,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sheehy v. ShinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Cashman v. RootCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Baldwin v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Kullman v. SimmensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. St. Paul Distilling Co. v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United Medical Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Dean v. ShingleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. McSweeneyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1991
  5. Cooke v. CookeUtah Supreme Court · 1926

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API