Legal Opinion

Carter v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1950No. Civ. 17474PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Austin Carter petitions for a writ of mandate by which it is sought to require the superior court to proceed to judgment in an action he has pending against Seaboard Finance Company without entertaining and determining issues raised by defendant’s amended and supplemental answers. The ground upon which he seeks relief is that the Supreme Court heretofore rendered its judgment by which it reversed in part a judgment rendered in favor of defendant and limited the issues to be retried in the superior court. Plaintiff’s action is for money. His complaint alleged three causes of action all arising…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Gilde v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. George Mefford v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  3. Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Bach v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Moore v. Municipal Court of Salinas Judicial Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API