Legal Opinion

Cooke v. Cooke

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1926No. 4357PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus involving the custody of a minor child, a girl about 5 years of age. The plaintiff, James Henry Cooke, in his complaint or petition, alledges that he is the father of the child; that he is a resident of the city of Toronto, province of Ontario, Dominion of Canada, where also the child and its mother, defendant herein, Hilda Betty Cooke, resided until, as it is alleged, she, surreptitiously and without the consent of the plaintiff, removed the child from Canada to the States; that the laws of Canada give him the paramount right to the custody and control…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Lynde v. . LyndeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Brashear v. BrashearIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Steiger v. SteigerUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Sampsell v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Clawson v. Boston Acme Mines Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API