Legal Opinion
October Twenty-Four, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 23, 1994No. 12655PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendants, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Plainville (commission) and Tomasso Brothers, Inc. (Tomasso). Tomasso filed an application with the commission for site plan approval of an office park. The commission granted the site plan application and the plaintiff, October Twenty-Four, Inc., appealed to the Superior Court. Tomasso moved to dismiss the appeal, and the Superior Court granted the motion. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) decided that General Statutes § 8-7d (b),…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Circle Lanes of Fairfield, Inc. v. FaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Upjohn Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Dragan v. Connecticut Medical Examining BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Leo Fedus & Sons Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clifford v. PLAN. AND ZON. COM'N OF ANSONIASupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Kauai Springs, Inc. v. Planning CommissionHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2013
- Center Shops of East Granby, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.