Legal Opinion

R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 10, 2007No. AC 27828PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The plaintiffs, R & R Pool & Patio, Inc., Mitchell Ross, David Ross and Philip Ross, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Ridgefield (board), following the granting of the defendant’s motion to strike the complaint. Appeals relating to the plaintiffs’ use of their property have been before this court on four previous occasions. In this appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly determined that the board was not required to review their site plan application within the time…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Leo Fedus & Sons Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Carr v. WoolwichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API