Legal Opinion
Upjohn Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 24, 1992No. 14428PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue of this appeal and cross appeal1 is whether the plaintiff, The Upjohn Company (Upjohn), may collaterally attack, in a zoning enforcement proceeding brought in 1986, the validity of a condition to zoning permits that had been imposed in 1983 but that had not been challenged by direct appeal at that time. The defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of North Haven (board), appeals and Upjohn cross appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining Upjohn’s zoning appeal from a decision of the board. The board’s decision had upheld a cease and desist order…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Smith v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- In re Shamika F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Gangemi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Savoy Laundry, Inc. v. Town of StratfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- City of Torrington v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.