Leo Fedus & Sons Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs, Leo Fedus and Sons Construction Company, Inc., et al.,1 were entitled to the auto*434matic approval of their site plan application to permit the construction of an asphalt plant in Colchester because the Colchester zoning board of appeals, believing that it did not have jurisdiction over their appeal, did not hold a public hearing within the time limits set forth in General Statutes § 8-7d (a). The defendants, the zoning board of appeals for the town and borough of Colchester (board) and Robert Bourassa, its chairperson, appealed to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. BunkleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. PerruccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Donohue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Caserta v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Luce v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Fruin v. Colonnade One At Old Greenwich Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Katz v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.