Legal Opinion

City of Ada v. Burrow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1935No. 23449PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Pontotoc county. Plaintiff in error, the city' of Ada, a municipal corporation, was defendant in the district court, and the defendant in error, W. L. Burrow, was plaintiff in the lower court. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff’s suit was brought to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff when he fell on a sidewalk in the city of Ada, on August 16, 1930, at the hour of 2 o’clock in the afternoon. Plaintiff sought to hold the city liable by reason of an alleged…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. FryeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Armstrong v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. The Town of Norman v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  4. City of Bristow v. PinkleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. City of Chickasha v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Lewis v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Oklahoma City v. BanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Oklahoma City v. CantrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. City of Tulsa v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API