Legal Opinion
Smith v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 9, 1935No. 25894PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
This action was commenced by plaintiff in error, Cora A. Smith, against the city of Tulsa, a municipal corporation, defendant in error, by filing her petition in the district court of .Tulsa county, Okla., on the 27th day of December, 1932. The parties hereafter will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the lower court.
The plaintiff alleges in her petition that she is a resident of the city of Tulsa, and averred that the city of Tulsa owed her a duty to keep its streets and sidewalks in a reasonably safe condition for travel by herself and other pedestrians, but that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- District of Columbia v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- City of Tulsa v. FryeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- City of Ada v. BurrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Russell v. MargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Lewis v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- City of Drumright v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Oklahoma City v. BanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- City of Tulsa v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.