The Town of Norman v. Teel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from- the District Court of Cleveland County; before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Hainer, J.:
This was an action brought by the defendant in error against the town of Norman to recover dam'ages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of a defective sidewalk on one of the streets of said town. The defense interposed by the town was that the sidewalk at the point where the injury occured was in a reasonably safe condition for travel., and that the town had no notice, either actual or constructive, of the defect which caused the injury; that if the sidewalk was out of repair the plaintiff had knowledge of the same, and the injury…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rehberg v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- City of Aurora v. HillmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- City of Bloomington v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- City of Chicago v. DalleIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Sullivan v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of Hugo v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- City of Ada v. BurrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Bellevue Gas & Oil Co. v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- City of Seminole v. MooringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Town of Fairfax v. GiraudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.