Legal Opinion
City of Chickasha v. Daniels
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 4, 1926No. 16391PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, 0.
The parties hereto will be designated as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff, William Daniels, alleges that on January 26, 1922, while riding a bicycle across the intersection of 'Chickasha avenue a>nd Fourth street in the city of Chickasha, where the asphalt pavement sloped from the center or a crown of the street to the curl) on either side, his bicycle slipped, and he fell, breaking his -leg, and knocking down his knee cap; that the defendant permitted its streets to be sprinkled with water from a watering cart in the winter time, and when sprinkled the water…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- City of Muncie v. HeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Decker v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Magaha v. Mayor of HagerstownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
- City of Hugo v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Woodall v. Chandler Material Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- The First National Bank of South Carolina of Columbia v. Glens Falls Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- City of Ada v. BurrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Spaur v. City of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City of Houston v. HagmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.