Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 13, 1924No. Nos. 14433, 14686 (Consolidated)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.
May Armstrong brought suit against the city of Tulsa, a municipal corporation, Tibbets & Pleasant, a corporation, and the Oklahoma Natural Gas Company, a corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her by reason of a defective condition of a street in the city of Tulsa. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the court sustained the separate demurrers of the defendants thereto, and rendered judgment in their favor, from which the plaintiff has appealed.
The evidence discloses that the Oklahoma Natural Gas Company had lowered its gas main at…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Daugherty v. HerzogIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Salliotte v. King Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- First Presbyterian Congregation v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Pickens v. Tulsa Metropolitan MinistrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Leigh v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Greenwood v. Lyles & Buckner, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.